Central Library for and against

My highlighting:

The Twentieth Century Society:

“The Twentieth Century Society is tremendously disappointed by the Minister’s decision not to follow the advice of her advisers and list Birmingham Central Library. EH advice on listing is not often overturned and this is a key case in that regard. Minister Margaret Hodge has made no secret of her personal dislike for post-war buildings and has here failed to understand the basic premise of heritage protection in England.

Listing Birmingham’s impressive brutalist library would not prevent renovation work, or even a well-designed radical makeover. Libraries need to be flexible as the services  they provide will continue to evolve. We believe not only that the Central Library is historically and architecturally significant, but that it is capable of being adapted for the needs of 21st century Birmingham. What listing would do is make sure that proposals took into account the historic interest of these structures rather than seeking to change or even demolish them.

One of the key strengths of our heritage system is that listing is decided purely on the basis of architectural or historic interest. This then allows a detailed analysis of economic viability and wider social issues to follow. This  works very well and any problems that occur generally reflect lack of skills, experience and confidence of local authority planning departments and committees. The process does not require Margaret Hodge to fix it. BCL, designed by one of Birmingham’s most accomplished architectural sons, John Madin, could have another life. The Twentieth Century Society will continue working alongside the local groups who have done so much to push the debate forward”

Architect Tom Hewitt, a design director at 3DReid’s Birmingham office:

“I am proud to be from Birmingham and I can see some architectural merits of the existing library, especially in terms of its context relative to the period and the bravery of the design in that era… but I don’t like it and I never have.”

from The Architect’s Journal.

  • TommyD

    Against my better judgment, I shall weigh in on this wankfest.nnThe anti argument seems to be that Central Library is shit and should therefore be torn down. nnThe pro argument seems to be that Central Library is an excellent example of shit and should remain in place as a monument to shit. nnThis all seems fairly irrelevant to me considering the new library isn’t even in the same place. Has anyone said what will actually be built on the site of the old library? The building is horrible for its purpose, but would probably make decent offices.

  • TommyD

    Against my better judgment, I shall weigh in on this wankfest.nnThe anti argument seems to be that Central Library is shit and should therefore be torn down. nnThe pro argument seems to be that Central Library is an excellent example of shit and should remain in place as a monument to shit. nnThis all seems fairly irrelevant to me considering the new library isn’t even in the same place. Has anyone said what will actually be built on the site of the old library? The building is horrible for its purpose, but would probably make decent offices.

  • Council have decided that Argent the developers will be allowed to create “Brindleyplace Mark 2” in it’s space.nnThe “it’s shit it must go” argument doesn’t hold water u2014u00a0as you say it’s a fine example u2014u00a0I don’t like Mariah Carey but I don’t suggest we sell her off and open a Costa Coffee in her place.

  • Council have decided that Argent the developers will be allowed to create “Brindleyplace Mark 2” in it’s space.nnThe “it’s shit it must go” argument doesn’t hold water u2014u00a0as you say it’s a fine example u2014u00a0I don’t like Mariah Carey but I don’t suggest we sell her off and open a Costa Coffee in her place.

  • TommyD

    Why the fuck not? Cut off her head and put it on a pike as a warning to the others. We’ll still have her music, on record. In much the same way, we’ll still have a record of the old library, blueprints, they could make a virtual tour, someone is probably making a scale model of it as we speak.

  • TommyD

    Why the fuck not? Cut off her head and put it on a pike as a warning to the others. We’ll still have her music, on record. In much the same way, we’ll still have a record of the old library, blueprints, they could make a virtual tour, someone is probably making a scale model of it as we speak.

  • TommyD

    Against my better judgment, I shall weigh in on this wankfest.

    The anti argument seems to be that Central Library is shit and should therefore be torn down.

    The pro argument seems to be that Central Library is an excellent example of shit and should remain in place as a monument to shit.

    This all seems fairly irrelevant to me considering the new library isn't even in the same place. Has anyone said what will actually be built on the site of the old library? The building is horrible for its purpose, but would probably make decent offices.

  • Council have decided that Argent the developers will be allowed to create “Brindleyplace Mark 2” in it's space.

    The “it's shit it must go” argument doesn't hold water — as you say it's a fine example — I don't like Mariah Carey but I don't suggest we sell her off and open a Costa Coffee in her place.

  • TommyD

    Why the fuck not? Cut off her head and put it on a pike as a warning to the others. We'll still have her music, on record. In much the same way, we'll still have a record of the old library, blueprints, they could make a virtual tour, someone is probably making a scale model of it as we speak.