<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bolt-on fix for New Street &#039;eyesore&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2009/11/bolt-on-fix-for-new-street-eyesore.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2009/11/bolt-on-fix-for-new-street-eyesore.html</link>
	<description>Mildly Sarcastic Since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulashton</title>
		<link>http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2009/11/bolt-on-fix-for-new-street-eyesore.html/comment-page-1#comment-5534</link>
		<dc:creator>paulashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2009/11/bolt-on-fix-for-new-street-eyesore.html#comment-5534</guid>
		<description>This is no surprise to me, but what seems to be ignored is the possibility of a new station out on the east side to serve the planned high speed rail and then link passengers to the city center at New Street.  Such a plan has been proposed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As one old enough to remember the original twin stations at New Street, the 1960s track design was a great improvement.  The bottleneck is not within the station but at the London end where there are only four tracks.  When the Bull Ring/Bullring was rebuilt (both times) the tunnel underneath could have been widened.  But it wasn&#039;t.  Therein lies the problem.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And, just to consider, the new St. Pancras International received a similar makeover!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is no surprise to me, but what seems to be ignored is the possibility of a new station out on the east side to serve the planned high speed rail and then link passengers to the city center at New Street.  Such a plan has been proposed.</p>
<p>As one old enough to remember the original twin stations at New Street, the 1960s track design was a great improvement.  The bottleneck is not within the station but at the London end where there are only four tracks.  When the Bull Ring/Bullring was rebuilt (both times) the tunnel underneath could have been widened.  But it wasn&#39;t.  Therein lies the problem.</p>
<p>And, just to consider, the new St. Pancras International received a similar makeover!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaverman33</title>
		<link>http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2009/11/bolt-on-fix-for-new-street-eyesore.html/comment-page-1#comment-5532</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaverman33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2009/11/bolt-on-fix-for-new-street-eyesore.html#comment-5532</guid>
		<description>Grrrrrrr. I&#039;m getting annoyed by all of this!!! The phrase complete waste of time and money springs to mind. New Street needs bulldozing not lipstick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grrrrrrr. I&#39;m getting annoyed by all of this!!! The phrase complete waste of time and money springs to mind. New Street needs bulldozing not lipstick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

