<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birmingham&#039;s Flapper and Firkin faces demolition &#8211; Birmingham Mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2008/07/birminghams-flapper-and-firkin-faces-demolition-birmingham-mail.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2008/07/birminghams-flapper-and-firkin-faces-demolition-birmingham-mail.html</link>
	<description>Mildly Sarcastic Since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon gray</title>
		<link>http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2008/07/birminghams-flapper-and-firkin-faces-demolition-birmingham-mail.html/comment-page-1#comment-2479</link>
		<dc:creator>simon gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birminghamitsnotshit.co.uk/2008/07/birminghams-flapper-and-firkin-faces-demolition-birmingham-mail.html#comment-2479</guid>
		<description>i could &lt;strong&gt;almost&lt;/strong&gt; bring myself to support it (well i couldn&#039;t, but you know what it mean) if the development was remotely guaranteed to do something about the shortage of residential / long term moorings provision in birmingham for boat owners.

as it is, i expect it&#039;ll actually even be counterproductive on that score, by taking the existing moorings away from cambrian wharf in favour of providing more balconies for the restaurants, or at best just shuffling around the temporary moorings for the holiday boaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i could <strong>almost</strong> bring myself to support it (well i couldn&#8217;t, but you know what it mean) if the development was remotely guaranteed to do something about the shortage of residential / long term moorings provision in birmingham for boat owners.</p>
<p>as it is, i expect it&#8217;ll actually even be counterproductive on that score, by taking the existing moorings away from cambrian wharf in favour of providing more balconies for the restaurants, or at best just shuffling around the temporary moorings for the holiday boaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

