Birmingham: It’s Not Shit

You’ve got Mail, dot net

Birmingham: It's Not Shit loves Birmingham and has loads of news and features. If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed.

Interesting interview on journalism.co.uk with Steve Dyson, editor of the Birmingham Mail, where he makes some points about the future of local journalism – more of that later I’m sure – but the main thrust for us now is the launch of a new Mail website BirminghamMail.net. So, set AdBlock to stun, and let’s go and have a look:

I think it’s universally accepted that the icbirmingham (and other ic.. sites) are pretty poor, for navigation and layout at least, even if the content is there - so it’s nice to see a fresh screen layout with obvious catergories and - which comes as a shock - pictures!

Yes, there are quite large banner ads, but so far I’ve not seen any that pop-up over the text – that’s admirable restraint, far more than The Guardian, for example, shows. Good going.

One problem that illustrates the peculiarity and the difference about content online is the journalists/subs use of “today”, “tomorrow” etc. in headlines – we don’t have the context online that we have with the physical copies “is that today’s Mail?”. Use of airy times online, where content can stay on a page for longer, means that “FOUR unsigned Midland bands are battling it out in Birmingham tonight” can’t work.

There are RSS feeds, loads of them, in sensible catergories - they’re not publishing full content tho’, which is dissapointing. It needs to be a very catchy headline/summary to pull me to the main site, but we can understand how it can be difficult for a print-based business to think of monetarising feeds from the off. Columnists’ feeds in full would be a nice easy way to break them in gently – an ad at the bottom of feed content isn’t obtrusive, and can be really targeted.

Not even publishing full content on the site is a little more of a mistake: “For more on this story, read today’s Birmingham Mail.” is a dreadful phrase that appears at the bottom of some of the news items. This is quite a big omission, particualrly as the web becomes this huge searchable archive. People hitting old pages need to see the full text – imagine the google searches that will bring you to the Mail site, but if you find precious little content you’re not going to click – bye bye long tail ad revenue. A compromise would perhaps be to flesh out with the full story the next day?

There’s use of tags, which is good, and good tag and related tags pages as a way of browsing. I’m not sure everyone’s quite got it yet, a page about a sausage tasting is tagged “sausage tasting” - is this going to be a regular one? (As an aside the tag page for sausague tasting doesn’t have any stories on it - a technical issue to solve I think.).

The blogs are quite hidden - not in the main navigation, only at the bottom. So far there’s no commenting on stories, but there are forums.

One hell of an improvement overall, go have a look and tell us what you think.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 29th, 2008 at 11:37 am by bounder and is filed under internet. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Help improve our tagging - add some appropriate tags to this post: